NEW
DELHI: Gujarat and West Bengal have raised the red flag on the setting up of
the 7th Pay Commission, saying it would lead to unwanted financial stress which
they cannot afford.
The
two states, which are leading the charge in the coming Lok Sabha elections with
their chief ministers as prime ministerial candidates, have told the Centre
that the revision of salaries would increase the burden on states and this
would be most inopportune in view of global economic slowdown and debt
condition.
While
Gujarat said the central pay panel's recommendations have encouraged
"contract employment" which is not governed by government salary
structures, Bengal said the pay panel must evolve a mechanism to provide
financial assistance to states to meet costs of salary review - 100% assistance
in Bengal's case.
The
objection to the pay panel is hardly a populist move given that the
Congress-led Centre decided to announce it ahead of Lok Sabha elections to woo
the voters.
Gujarat,
whose CM Narendra Modi is the BJP's PM candidate, said the financial burden of
the 7th Pay Commission would be substantial. It argued that drastic increase in
expenditure because of pay revision would affect state finances.
In
contrast to Gujarat's fear of pay panel hitting its revenue which is in surplus
right now, the Bengal government has taken the opposite argument that it is
already debt-stressed and cannot afford salary revision.
The
Mamata Banerjee regime has demanded 100% financial assistance, fearing that
constitution of the panel for central employees would put pressure on the state
to follow suit.
Banerjee
has never hidden the fact that Bengal's finances are in dire straits, blaming
it on the previous Left Front regime, but opposition to the pay commission is
not seen as a savvy move given that employees form a significant vote base that
no political party would like to antagonize.
In
fact, UPA has gone to the other extreme of wooing the vast serving and retired
defence personnel by agreeing that the pay panel would separately review the
salary structure of armed forces keeping in view of the uniqueness of their
service conditions. It has already announced one-rank one-pension for armed
forces.
Expressing
helplessness on taking extra salary burden, Bengal has told the Centre that
"it has not been able to grant dearness allowance to employees at par with
central employees".
Speaking
against the pay revision, Gujarat said constant hikes by pay commissions had
caused labour market distortions vis-a-vis private sector salaries.
Also, it added that increasing
salaries were forcing states to take recourse to "contract
appointments", creating two sets of employees which was leading to social
and legal problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment